Hollywood & the Catholic Legion of Decency (CLOD).

 

Image result for CATHOLIC LEGION OF DECENCY

At the zenith of their power the ‘Seven Sisters’ (MGM, Warners, Paramount, Universal, Columbia, Fox and RKO) did much as they pleased. Few outsiders had any influence over their decisions or their conduct. Few, that is, with the exception of the Catholic Legion of Decency (CLOD). They were a force to be reckoned with and they exercised their power each year by publishing their ‘Index’, a list of movies the Legion considered sinful.

What that list meant, of course, was a huge loss of revenue for any studio whose productions had been condemned by the Church and had made it into the Index. Millions of Catholics were warned – ‘watch these films and your immortal soul will be endangered, if not out and out lost’. The Catholic Church, not unlike all other religious organizations, elected itself as the public’s guardian on all issues related to morality, certain that its judgment was manifestly superior to that of  every man (or woman) in the street. It also believed it had been afforded the God-given right to decide that overall good was far more important than individual liberty.

In 1938 the ‘Pledge of the Legion of Decency’ was created and administered each year on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception (December 8). In 1965 the CLOD changed its name to the National Catholic Office for Motion Pictures (NCOMP). The Legion still gives its views on movies year in and year out, but it no longer threatens its flock with ‘burning in Hell for eternity’ if they watch a condemned picture.

The Church rating system for pictures fell into three main categories: A, B & C.

A:        Morally objectionable.

B:        Morally objectionable in part.

C:        Condemned.

In 1978 the B and C ratings were condensed into an ‘O’ rating – ‘morally offensive’. The first lists came out in 1933, and appeared every year thereafter until the last one was published in 1980. Below are some of the more interesting titles that made the condemned list:

1933

 Related image

Hedy Lamarr in Ecstasy

Twenty-two productions made the list in 1933, among them the Hedy Lamarr sensation Extase (Ecstasy). No surprise there, given that Hedy ran about topless for quite a while and appeared to enjoy an orgasm as well!

Related image

What is surprising is the inclusion of the Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers hit Flying Down to Rio, however, although quite a few of the girls on the airplane wings during the Flying Down to Rio sequence were wearing see-through tops, so maybe that was why.

1941

 Image result for two-faced woman 1941

Garbo in Two-Faced Woman

Greta Garbo’s final film was Two-Faced Woman for MGM in 1941 – and the CLOD condemned it! In fact, it was banned outright in Boston, Providence, Omaha, Chicago and Milwaukee. The Legion cited its ‘immoral and un-Christian attitude towards marriage and its obligations’. A year later the lady’s MGM contract was terminated. In truth they were glad to see her go. Her movies only made money in Europe and WW2 had put the kibosh on the European film business.

1942

 Image result for white cargo

Mixed marriage – shocking!

Hedy Lamarr found herself a victim of the CLOD and the Hays Office a second time when White Cargo received the kiss of box-office death in 1942. The reason this time was good old miscegenation. Evidently, the CLOD had it straight from God that he disapproved of Hedy’s African native woman, Tondelayo, tying the marital knot with her white lover. Mixing the races! Heaven forbid. Was there no limit to the depths Hollywood might sink to?

1943

Image result for the outlaw 

Jane Russell in The Outlaw

Given the massive publicity campaign by Howard Hughes that was almost entirely focused on star Jane Russell’s not inconsiderable breasts, a condemnation of The Outlaw by the CLOD was more or less a certainty, not that it overly worried Howard all that much. Hughes was a firm believer that any publicity was good publicity. The movie was rubbish anyway. The Legion’s fuss about it put more bums on seats than the movie ever did.

1945

Image result for the dolly sisters 1945 

The Dolly Sisters played by June

Haver & Betty Grable

The Dolly Sisters copped a ‘C’ from the Legion, although I cannot discover why? Today, it would have been labeled 100% politically incorrect for the ‘Darktown Strutters Ball’ number alone, in which Betty Grable and June Haver as pig-tailed pica ninnies in black-face, danced about with chorus girls wearing hats made of watermelons, playing cards and dice! Safe to say the Church did not give the picture its ‘C’ rating for that reason.

1947

Related image 

Deborah Kerr in Black Narcissus

Deborah Kerr played Sister Clodagh, the Sister Superior at a school/hospital in the Himalayas, who is trying to forget a failed romance back home in Ireland, in the movie Black Narcissus. That was enough to start the alarm bells clanging at the Legion. They condemned the picture unless flashback scenes of her romance were edited out. So they were. This, combined with a theme that depicted nuns questioning their faith, was all too much for the bishops at the Legion.

Related image

Linda Darnell in Forever Amber

Forever Amber also got the big ‘thumbs down’ from the CLOD, which was scarcely a shock considering the book was about a courtesan from cover to cover.

Related image

Even Miracle on 34th Street barely scraped by with a ‘B’ rating from the CLOD, who were deeply concerned by its ‘sympathetic portrayal of a divorced woman’! Shameful.

1953

 Image result for the moon is blue 1953

Maggie McNamara & William Holden in The Moon is Blue

The Moon is Blue is one of those tantalizing pictures that promises much and delivers little. The plot is rather lame by today’s standards. A young, virtuous actress named Patty O’Neill spends the entire 99 minutes of screen time fending off the amorous overtures of two men intent on bedding her, then goes back home (her honor completely intact) and accepts a marriage proposal from her long-time boyfriend. The trouble was the script. It included words such as ‘seduce’ and ‘professional virgin’, which were completely unacceptable to the bishops. All very tame, as you can see, but not tame enough for the Legion who condemned the movie out of hand. Some theatres in small towns in America would only show it to audiences of all men or all women!

1955

Image result for the seven year itch (1955) 

Marilyn & Tom Ewell in

The Seven Year Itch

The only way to avoid a ‘C’ rating for Marilyn Monroe’s The Seven Year Itch, was for the entire adulterous sexual relationship to be played out in Tom Ewell’s head!

1956

 Image result for and god created woman

Bardot in…and God Created Woman

And God Created Women showed shots of Brigitte Bardot in various stages of undress, none of which showed a hell of a lot, but that was enough for the CLOD to condemn the picture at a hundred miles an hour! Police even made efforts to prevent it screening in some US cities. They need not have bothered. Miss Bardot revealed little.

1957

 Image result for love in the afternoon

Old Coops & young Audrey – Love in the Afternoon

Love in the Afternoon was hit with a ‘C’ by the Legion. The Church was most unhappy with the ending, compelling the studio to change it to a more conventional outcome. Gary Cooper whisks Audrey Hepburn away and the last we hear is that they married and lived happily ever after. Coops was 56 when he made this picture and far too old for Audrey who always looked younger than her years anyway, yet that did not seem to irk the Legion anywhere near as much as it irked me.

1959

 Image result for somelike it hot

Tony Curtis, Jack Lemmon & MM – Some Like It Hot

Billy Wilder’s classic comedy Some Like it Hot almost caused the Legion to have kittens! It had cross-dressing and it thought homosexuality could be funny! Unforgiveable. Oddly, the fact that Marilyn’s boobs were just about falling out of her dresses seemed to go un-noticed by the Legion. They had bigger fish to fry. It was the only American film condemned that year. The Hays Office banned it too, but the enormous box-office success of the movie hammered the final nail into the Hays Code once and for all.

1960

Image result for spartacus jean simmons 1960 

The Legion opted to condemn Spartacus because they felt it was pro-communist in its point of view, convinced that its ‘legitimacy as an expression of national aspirations’ was remiss. They even picketed theatres screening the film. The above scene showing Jean Simmons topless never made it to screens in Australia back then. (I was 13 then. I would have noticed), so we can assume the CLOD forced its removal. Only when the newly elected President John F. Kennedy, himself a Catholic, crossed picket-lines to see the movie did the Legion call off the boycott.

1962

Image result for to kill a mockingbird 1962 

It is difficult to imagine what possible reason the CLOD could offer that would warrant the condemnation of To Kill a Mocking Bird, yet they managed to come up with one. And they got their way as well. The bishops were unhappy about the ending. Why? They felt it gave the impression that lying, even for the best of reasons, was OK. And that, according to the Legion, was not OK. The producers amended the conclusion and the ‘C’ rating was lifted.

Thankfully, all this stupidity finally came to an end in 1980. Not so thankfully, we now have scarcely any rein on anything anymore. If only the Legion had focused its energies elsewhere, we might be thanking it today for keeping the lid on the real pornography – violence. Sadly, for the entire fifty plus years of its influence, the CLOD found it impossible to think past ‘tits and ass’ issues.

6 Comments

  1. I’ve read about canonizing Pius X11.Speaking of horrendous, that god-awful
    Dylann Roof thinks that Hitler will be sainted someday!
    My comment on violence in various art forms: If such is essential in contributing to the
    meaning of a script, painting, book,etc., it needs to be respected and considered.
    I have looked at paintings depicting war, using “violent” imagery. How is this done?
    Colors, shapes, lines, placement etc. It’s reasonable to assume if these images were
    removed, the pieces would be less powerful. The same can be said about movies, plays,
    books. I’m aware that someone else may not have the same response that I think I
    would have.
    How does one separate legitimate from illegitimate violence?
    I can only judge for myself. I trust the instincts of those creating works.

    Amen. Aren’t you glad this is over!

    • Sounds like that idiot Roof is just chasing headlines.I think violence as ‘entertainment’ is unacceptable, but if it is shown as a deterrant then I am for it. For example Spielberg’s depiction of the Omaha Beach landings in ‘Saving Private Ryan’is the greatest piece of anti-war propaganda I have ever seen. Any young person who watches that and still wants to go to war is a moron. I understand war veterans not wanting to talk about the horrors they have witnessed, so Spielberg’s movie does humanity a service. It uses violence to show war as the ultimate evil. Good on him.

  2. CLOD Such hypocrisy, while priests go around sexually abusing little boys!
    Violence. It appears that you are objecting mainly to the HEIGHTENED level of it?
    I particularly object to depiction of men sexually violating women, children, etc.
    I think all this plus what’s available online desensitizes us.
    I’ve run out of thoughts and words. Sheila

    • Of course, I am opposed to ANY violence against women, sexual or not. As for religious organizations, they tend to consider themselves above the law. Always have. It is no secret, for example, that a move has been afoot for some time now to canonize Pope Pius XII, the pope who never uttered a single word against Hitler and the Nazis throughout the entire Second World War! So much for standing up for the oppressed and opposing evil. Now they want to make this hypocrite a SAINT!It will probably happen too.

  3. Little, if any rein now. Sex is great. Sex plus violence is even greater!!
    [Bacall, when asked about movies, said she didn’t “want to see anybody DOING IT!”]

    • I used to think that the censorship during the studio days was ridiculously strict. Today it is virtually non-existent. It has always been a case of ‘all or nothing’. For some reason they cannot find an acceptable middle ground. Not acceptable to me anyway. It is a real pity, I feel, that they have always focused on sex when the real pornography is violence. I don’t care a whit about what is shown regarding sex (as long as children or animals are not involved), but I thoroughly detest the level of sickening violence allowable these days.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.